I'm a big believer in the right of copyright - My favourite opensource licence is the GPL. This wasn't always my favourite.
The core of the GPL is the right to copy it coupled with the duty to share-alike - so if you modify a GPL licenced "thing" then you're morally obligated to share those changes - and if you're selling that "thing" you're more than obligated, you're required to by law.
Most of my code in recent years has been GPL - there's a little "artistic licence" and a small bit of BSD and one WTFPL
I like having the powers to control what folks do with what I create - I like having legal recourse to protect - and so far the fear of the law is always more powerful than the law itself, so folks respect the GPL fairly consistently worldwide.
Never do i think that my creation of some lines of GPL code give me the right to search sniff everyone's internet traffic and analyze the packets, search computers, summarily disconnect computers, take down website only on my say so, or deprive a whole hospital of internet access.
And neither do i think that creating "things" like Police academy, windows vista, or dancing with the stars should give people the powers listed above. Never is anything, even a show as awesome as startrek, worthy enough to justify the loss of privacy, and the bypass of natural justice.
Quoting 3% of a magazine article below:
So, where in our national parks will New Zealand go mining?
Two types of greenies
Concern over new downloading laws
Homeopathy fans to testify.
Things i have learned about baby clothes
Urewera dreaming
Wellington Community Network shuts down
The truth about your ISP