There are so many fronts on which the "freedom" of the internet is
under attack in my own country, neighbouring countries, and elsewhere.
Here in New Zealand a new copyright act went into effect on 1st
November. The most controversial clause has been delayed until 28th
February. This clause says that an ISP must have a policy of
disconnecting anyone repeatedly accused of copyright infringment. ...
That's accusation only. There's no oppourtunity to defend yourself, no recourse for reconnection, and there's no penalty for false
accusations. If you want someone off the internet you need only
repeatedly accuse them of copyright infringement ("repeatedly" has
legal precidents to mean 3 times). Aparently file sharing is so bad
you don't even get a trial (can they not see where that logic leads?).
Even pedaphiles get a trial before they are considered guilty and
punished. I could not continue my occupation if i was disconnected.
There's also that great treaty called "ACTA" - Anti-Counterfeiting
Trade Agreement, which on the surface is defending against fake prada
handbags, but also fake baby prams (won't someone please think of the
children!).. and fake medicines. I'm unsure if they mean cheap generic medicines that infringes patents, or if they mean dangerous medicines
that aren't what they say on the labels -- but regardless, the Music
and Film industry have been asked for their wishlist (to crack down on
those dangerous counterfeit music tracks). The problem is the
countries participating in ACTA negotiations have signed with the USA
that they will not reveal the contents of the treaty until after they
ratify it.
The public were asked for submissions in New Zealand, but how the
frack am i to send a submission on a treaty when i cannot see the
contents of it?
In the EU a group of citizens used their official information act to
force the EU council to reveal the contents of this treaty... the
Council said No. Who are they accountable to? Aparently not to their
citizens and not to their own laws.
Within the wishlists of RIAA is making ISPs liable for copyright
infringement that happens through their networks.. This we need to be
very vocal about. How's an ISP to know whether a data packet contains a
copyright infringement?? by only allowing you to talk to sony.com +
apple.com ?
In other news, Australia looks like it's about to force all isps to
enforce a blacklist of IPs. The result is all of Australia's internet
access being filtered, in the on going mission to stamp out child
porn. Their internet is going to get horribly slow, and it's not going
to stop child porn. You just know the black list (a huge collection
of child porn website urls) is going to leak out straight into the
hands of the folks who want these urls. I hear a politician is trying
to get a list of all R18 sites and add that to a list also. That's
some huge list to check against on every packet. (not just port 80,
otherwise it'd be too easy to bypass).
So, where in our national parks will New Zealand go mining?
Two types of greenies
Concern over new downloading laws
Homeopathy fans to testify.
Things i have learned about baby clothes
Urewera dreaming
Wellington Community Network shuts down
The truth about your ISP